Next month, Renzo Martens,
along with his wife, son and baby daughter, are going to live in
eastern Congo so he can continue his five-year plan to gentrify the
jungle. The 41-year-old Dutch artist is trying to create an arts scene
in one of the most impoverished parts of the world.
It sounds like a sick joke. “It’s not,” Martens tells me when we meet in London. “I mean, it’s funny to call your programme a central African gentrification programme, but I’m basically putting a white cube in the forest to see what it does.”
There’s a little more to it than that. Martens is artistic director of an outfit called the Institute for Human Activities, which has helped artists from Kinshasa, capital of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, establish a critical curriculum akin to a foundation arts course for plantation workers. The Congolese Plantation Workers Art League has now started to organise exhibitions of self-portraits. At workshops, workers’ children drew what they imagined their futures would be. “Most of these kids had never had a pencil in their hands before,” he says.
Some critics have compared Martens to Klaus Kinski, the German actor who – in Werner Herzog’s film Fitzcarraldo – built an opera house in the Amazon rainforest. There are parallels. “I think this will be central Africa’s most extravagant and beautiful arts centre,” says Martens. Perhaps in the future, he muses, Congolese artists will sip cappuccinos in the jungle while discussing, say, critical strategies in contemporary art practice, just as they do in Shoreditch and Brooklyn.
Why is he doing this? “Clearly these people can’t live off plantation labour. But I think they can live off critical engagement with plantation labour.” By which he means workers making saleable art expressing their feelings about their lives. As we talk, Martens offers me a chocolate head, a reproduction of a self-portrait by a plantation worker. The original was made from river clay in eastern Congo. That clay bust was scanned, a 3D digital print was then used to make a mould into which chocolate was poured in Belgium. Some of the cocoa used came from the artist’s plantation.
Nibbling a chocolate ear, I tell Martens I feel awkward, even implicated in a kind of economic cannibalism. “Maybe you feel that you’re eating the soul of that person,” he replies, laughing at my compunctions. “But you’ve been eating it all along, so don’t worry.”
This has long been the artist’s concern: we in the west have been consuming Africa and Africans for centuries, sometimes titillated by our reactions of compassion, guilt and shame. Not only do we pay, say, Congolese workers pitiful salaries ($1 a day, Martens tells me, is the norm on palm oil plantations) to supply us with cocoa, rubber, coltan, or diamonds. But also, he says, poverty has itself become Africa’s leading export product, and one from which Europeans and Americans profit – images of such suffering accumulating cultural capital in the old centres of empire, rather than in the places they are supposed to critique.
In 2008, Martens made a film about these inequalities called Episode 3: Enjoy Poverty. Wearing a silly straw hat, he appears as himself, self-consciously performing “an artist on a mission”. The latest white man voyaging to the Conradian heart of darkness, Martens journeys into the jungle, accompanied by Congolese men carrying mysterious crates. Arriving in a village, he opens the crates to reveal neon signs. He straps them to bamboo frames, plugs the lights into a generator and turns them on. The words “Enjoy Poverty” shine out electric blue as locals dance in seeming celebration. Martens is a godless missionary come to teach the natives capitalism’s harsh gospel: how to monetise their poverty.
Accordingly, we see him coach village photographers, who hitherto have been taking happy pictures of locals at birthday parties, to sell images of starvation and death. But the Congolese photographers’ pictures of their neighbours’ malnourished children and dead babies don’t meet the demand from European and American media outlets as well as those by western photojournalists.
Still, if he was useless at helping Africans, Martens was brilliant at helping himself. He left Africa after two years with a film that was seen and discussed by western aid workers, NGO functionaries, academics, artists and critics. In 2013 he became a Yale World Fellow; in 2014 he’s been shortlisted for the £40,000 Artes Mundi prize, the UK’s most lucrative art competition.
But the film was still a failure, he says. “However critical it is of labour conditions in Congo, in the end it only improved labour conditions in Berlin’s Mitte and in New York’s Lower East Side. Because that’s where people see it, talk about it, write pieces about it - whether for or against doesn’t really matter.”
Martens has so far made two films. The first, called Episode 1, was made in 2000 in the Chechen war zone. As women in headscarves queued for aid packages in bombed-out Grozny, Martens asked them: “What do you think of me?” The point was that those doing the looking in the war zones were probably more interested in their own image, lives and loves than those of the suffering people whom they’d ostensibly come to depict. Like Enjoy Poverty, the film was about “its own conditions and dependencies and financial structures”. All art since the early 1900s, he argues, has become self-referential, and his films follow that tradition: “My job is to highlight the codes by which we live, including, in this case, what is watched by whom and for which agenda.”
Perhaps Martens should give up his art if he believes this, since it is premised on exploitation. He thinks not. “You can’t afford to be critical and then leave the real effects of art to real-estate investors and politicians.”
Hence Martens’s return to eastern Congo in 2012 with another idea of how to make plantation workers rich. Following American urban studies theorist Richard Florida, who has written about how art can revive depressed areas, Martens established his gentrification project. He thinks the Institute for Human Activities is tapping into a tradition in African art that can be marketed overseas. “Their work inspired the entire European avant garde – Picasso, Matisse – and that was great, but locally many of the pieces were destroyed because they were heretic[al] or something. So art production doesn’t play an active role in society any more, I would say.” Maybe it will. Consider the chocolate head I’ve been eating. “We can sell these for £40 a piece, they cost maybe £2 or £3 – so £37 profit.” The IHA has only sold 10 so far, but Martens hopes they will be sold on a much bigger scale through western department stores.
Only one problem. Earlier this year, Martens and the IHA were evicted from the plantation where they have been operating by Feronia, the Canadian firm who bought the business from Unilever in 2008. “We’re in exile, at an undisclosed location.” Feronia, Martens tells me, is supported by the British bank CDC. Both, he believes, are worried about what his project means for their business models.
He hopes they will allow him to return, but irrespective of what they decide, in January Martens is going back to pursue jungle gentrification, backed by European galleries, museums and chocolate producers. He’s already planned a conference at which the celebrated Cameroonian postcolonial theorist Achille Mbembe will speak; he’s brokering links with galleries, such as the Van Abbemuseum in Eindhoven, so there will be temporary exhibits of contemporary western artworks. “It’ll be the same sort of art you’d see at the Unilever series at Tate Modern,” he says. He’s also planning a residency programme for western artists. “If you really want to come to terms with the role of art in society, this is the place to see it – not hopping between New York and Berlin.” Eventually, with western art world grants and – fingers crossed – prize money, there will be a white cube of a gallery, just like the ones in western art capitals. “Except it will be made of bamboo,” he says.
Why is he doing all this? “I’m not a revolutionary and I’m not particularly close to these plantation workers. I just try to openly, overtly and consciously perform the role God has for me.”
I think he may joking about God, but not about his hopes for Congo’s new art scene. “It’s ridiculous that they’re doing this manual labour when they have so much to teach us about all the changes we’re going to go through. If it’s true that we’re going to have climate change and imploding social democracy and growing inequality, and I guess it is, then they know all about it. They’re years ahead of us.”
• Renzo Martens is one of 10 shortlisted artists for the Artes Mundi 6 prize. The prize show is at National Museum Cardiff, Chapter Cardiff and Ffotogallery, Wales, until 22 February. Details: artesmundi.org
-----
It sounds like a sick joke. “It’s not,” Martens tells me when we meet in London. “I mean, it’s funny to call your programme a central African gentrification programme, but I’m basically putting a white cube in the forest to see what it does.”
There’s a little more to it than that. Martens is artistic director of an outfit called the Institute for Human Activities, which has helped artists from Kinshasa, capital of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, establish a critical curriculum akin to a foundation arts course for plantation workers. The Congolese Plantation Workers Art League has now started to organise exhibitions of self-portraits. At workshops, workers’ children drew what they imagined their futures would be. “Most of these kids had never had a pencil in their hands before,” he says.
Some critics have compared Martens to Klaus Kinski, the German actor who – in Werner Herzog’s film Fitzcarraldo – built an opera house in the Amazon rainforest. There are parallels. “I think this will be central Africa’s most extravagant and beautiful arts centre,” says Martens. Perhaps in the future, he muses, Congolese artists will sip cappuccinos in the jungle while discussing, say, critical strategies in contemporary art practice, just as they do in Shoreditch and Brooklyn.
Why is he doing this? “Clearly these people can’t live off plantation labour. But I think they can live off critical engagement with plantation labour.” By which he means workers making saleable art expressing their feelings about their lives. As we talk, Martens offers me a chocolate head, a reproduction of a self-portrait by a plantation worker. The original was made from river clay in eastern Congo. That clay bust was scanned, a 3D digital print was then used to make a mould into which chocolate was poured in Belgium. Some of the cocoa used came from the artist’s plantation.
Nibbling a chocolate ear, I tell Martens I feel awkward, even implicated in a kind of economic cannibalism. “Maybe you feel that you’re eating the soul of that person,” he replies, laughing at my compunctions. “But you’ve been eating it all along, so don’t worry.”
This has long been the artist’s concern: we in the west have been consuming Africa and Africans for centuries, sometimes titillated by our reactions of compassion, guilt and shame. Not only do we pay, say, Congolese workers pitiful salaries ($1 a day, Martens tells me, is the norm on palm oil plantations) to supply us with cocoa, rubber, coltan, or diamonds. But also, he says, poverty has itself become Africa’s leading export product, and one from which Europeans and Americans profit – images of such suffering accumulating cultural capital in the old centres of empire, rather than in the places they are supposed to critique.
In 2008, Martens made a film about these inequalities called Episode 3: Enjoy Poverty. Wearing a silly straw hat, he appears as himself, self-consciously performing “an artist on a mission”. The latest white man voyaging to the Conradian heart of darkness, Martens journeys into the jungle, accompanied by Congolese men carrying mysterious crates. Arriving in a village, he opens the crates to reveal neon signs. He straps them to bamboo frames, plugs the lights into a generator and turns them on. The words “Enjoy Poverty” shine out electric blue as locals dance in seeming celebration. Martens is a godless missionary come to teach the natives capitalism’s harsh gospel: how to monetise their poverty.
Accordingly, we see him coach village photographers, who hitherto have been taking happy pictures of locals at birthday parties, to sell images of starvation and death. But the Congolese photographers’ pictures of their neighbours’ malnourished children and dead babies don’t meet the demand from European and American media outlets as well as those by western photojournalists.
Still, if he was useless at helping Africans, Martens was brilliant at helping himself. He left Africa after two years with a film that was seen and discussed by western aid workers, NGO functionaries, academics, artists and critics. In 2013 he became a Yale World Fellow; in 2014 he’s been shortlisted for the £40,000 Artes Mundi prize, the UK’s most lucrative art competition.
But the film was still a failure, he says. “However critical it is of labour conditions in Congo, in the end it only improved labour conditions in Berlin’s Mitte and in New York’s Lower East Side. Because that’s where people see it, talk about it, write pieces about it - whether for or against doesn’t really matter.”
Martens has so far made two films. The first, called Episode 1, was made in 2000 in the Chechen war zone. As women in headscarves queued for aid packages in bombed-out Grozny, Martens asked them: “What do you think of me?” The point was that those doing the looking in the war zones were probably more interested in their own image, lives and loves than those of the suffering people whom they’d ostensibly come to depict. Like Enjoy Poverty, the film was about “its own conditions and dependencies and financial structures”. All art since the early 1900s, he argues, has become self-referential, and his films follow that tradition: “My job is to highlight the codes by which we live, including, in this case, what is watched by whom and for which agenda.”
Perhaps Martens should give up his art if he believes this, since it is premised on exploitation. He thinks not. “You can’t afford to be critical and then leave the real effects of art to real-estate investors and politicians.”
Hence Martens’s return to eastern Congo in 2012 with another idea of how to make plantation workers rich. Following American urban studies theorist Richard Florida, who has written about how art can revive depressed areas, Martens established his gentrification project. He thinks the Institute for Human Activities is tapping into a tradition in African art that can be marketed overseas. “Their work inspired the entire European avant garde – Picasso, Matisse – and that was great, but locally many of the pieces were destroyed because they were heretic[al] or something. So art production doesn’t play an active role in society any more, I would say.” Maybe it will. Consider the chocolate head I’ve been eating. “We can sell these for £40 a piece, they cost maybe £2 or £3 – so £37 profit.” The IHA has only sold 10 so far, but Martens hopes they will be sold on a much bigger scale through western department stores.
Only one problem. Earlier this year, Martens and the IHA were evicted from the plantation where they have been operating by Feronia, the Canadian firm who bought the business from Unilever in 2008. “We’re in exile, at an undisclosed location.” Feronia, Martens tells me, is supported by the British bank CDC. Both, he believes, are worried about what his project means for their business models.
He hopes they will allow him to return, but irrespective of what they decide, in January Martens is going back to pursue jungle gentrification, backed by European galleries, museums and chocolate producers. He’s already planned a conference at which the celebrated Cameroonian postcolonial theorist Achille Mbembe will speak; he’s brokering links with galleries, such as the Van Abbemuseum in Eindhoven, so there will be temporary exhibits of contemporary western artworks. “It’ll be the same sort of art you’d see at the Unilever series at Tate Modern,” he says. He’s also planning a residency programme for western artists. “If you really want to come to terms with the role of art in society, this is the place to see it – not hopping between New York and Berlin.” Eventually, with western art world grants and – fingers crossed – prize money, there will be a white cube of a gallery, just like the ones in western art capitals. “Except it will be made of bamboo,” he says.
Why is he doing all this? “I’m not a revolutionary and I’m not particularly close to these plantation workers. I just try to openly, overtly and consciously perform the role God has for me.”
I think he may joking about God, but not about his hopes for Congo’s new art scene. “It’s ridiculous that they’re doing this manual labour when they have so much to teach us about all the changes we’re going to go through. If it’s true that we’re going to have climate change and imploding social democracy and growing inequality, and I guess it is, then they know all about it. They’re years ahead of us.”
• Renzo Martens is one of 10 shortlisted artists for the Artes Mundi 6 prize. The prize show is at National Museum Cardiff, Chapter Cardiff and Ffotogallery, Wales, until 22 February. Details: artesmundi.org
-----
No comments:
Post a Comment