Monday, 7 March 2016

Robert Mapplethorpe | Turning Child Abuse into Fine Art?

Melia Marden, 1983

Honey, 1976 by Robert Mapplethorpe


Robert Mapplethorpe, Child Protection by Joe Pollitt

"In the run up to HBO's series on Robert Mapplethorpe out in April: It is not so much the photographer rather the Institutions like the Guggenheim, the Robert Mapplethorpe Foundation and others that have created our unhealthy society. They are those that have profited the most by their exploits with the images of innocent naked children and sold them in sets of 10 signed Edition Prints and even postcards, now regarded as works of Fine Art? The Establishment have certainly found their Market for the appetite of the perverse; all those more than willing to part with their cash and pay for the privilege of owning an abused Mapplethorpe child nude just to display either on their walls or to be kept in their vaults. In the 1976, 1983 and 1988 the photographer took a series of private snapshots of naked children from the homes of the rich and famous. This was intentional as he explored the idea of taboo sexual exploits. It is one thing to photograph consensual adults in leather and chains or in distorted torturous poses and in explicit sexual positions but quite another when it comes to stealing the playful naivety of children in the name of heinous fantasy Art. Some things are worth protecting and childhood innocence is most definitely one of them."

Comment by Joe Pollitt

Image by Joe Pollitt
Blog/Website: Joe Pollitt

Shock Snap

Source: TIME MAGAZING











dek
AP
A Cincinnati protest, 1990
June 12, Washington, D.C., U.S.

The show was called "the perfect moment." it could just as well have been called "The Perfect Storm."

Twenty years ago, a traveling exhibition of photographs by Robert Mapplethorpe set off one of the fiercest episodes of America's "culture wars" — the enduring squabble over sexually explicit or sacrilegious art, leering pop music, raunchy TV comedies, radio shock jocks and every other sign of lewdness and irreverence in public life. Had he been around to see it, Mapplethorpe might have enjoyed the enormous fuss he had caused. But he had died in March 1989, at age 42, of complications from AIDS. By the time of his death, he was famous for three kinds of images: cool, rigorously conceived portraits and figure studies; sharply lit pictures of flowers; and photographs of gay S and M that left nothing to the imagination. Though he wasn't a fashion photographer, like Helmut Newton, Mapplethorpe trafficked in swank transgression. No less than his portraits and floral studies, his blunt images of rough sex — a man urinating into another man's mouth, a fist inserted just so into a man's anus — were serenely composed and luxuriously lighted. The result may not always have expressed a perfect moment but it always presented a perfect paradox: a calm Apollonian framework for wild Dionysian content. And, like the Parthenon when it served as a powder keg for the Ottoman Turks, it was only a matter of time before it exploded.

Pictures of all three kinds were in "The Perfect Moment," though the S&M material was confined to an "X" portfolio that museums displayed in age-restricted cases or galleries. The show opened without incident in Philadelphia and moved from there to Chicago. The trouble started in the weeks leading to what was planned to be a July 1 opening at the Corcoran Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C.

A Political Backlash

At the time, conservatives were already furious over Piss Christ, a photograph by Andres Serrano that showed a plastic crucifix immersed in a tank of what was said to be urine. What had them so angry was that Serrano had received a $15,000 grant from a North Carolina arts group that in turn had gotten money from the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), the federal agency established in 1965 to subsidize artists and arts groups. In May, two Republican senators, Jesse Helms of North Carolina and Alfonse D'Amato of New York, denounced Serrano from the Senate floor, where D'Amato ripped to pieces the catalog of the show the picture had appeared in.

It wasn't long before Helms learned about the Mapplethorpe show, for which the NEA had provided $30,000 to the Philadelphia museum that had organized it. In June he sent around copies of the offending pictures to members of Congress. Soon more than 100 of them signed an angry letter to the NEA criticizing it for subsidizing a show that featured "morally repugnant materials of a sexual nature." The agency's defenders pointed to federal law that prohibited it from interfering with the content of the art it helped finance.

Although the Corcoran had gotten nothing from the NEA to subsidize its presentation of the Mapplethorpes, it received around $300,000 a year in federal funding. Concerned that a fight over the exhibit would just make things worse for the NEA — and that her museum could get caught up in the mess — the Corcoran's director, Christina Orr-Cahall, announced on June 12 that she was canceling the show. "We really felt this exhibit was at the wrong place at the wrong time," she said. "We could not and would not allow ourselves to be drawn into the [NEA funding] debate." Now it was the turn of the art world to be outraged. Important Corcoran staffers resigned in protest. A group of angry Washington, D.C., artists projected pictures by Mapplethorpe onto the exterior of the museum. In the months that followed, Corcoran membership dropped by 10%, and prominent artists including Ross Bleckner, Annette Lemieux and David Salle forbade the museum to exhibit their work. Meanwhile, the Mapplethorpe exhibition was picked up by another venue in the capital, the Washington Project for the Arts, where it was seen by nearly 50,000 people in less than a month.

All this proved too much for the Corcoran's board of trustees. Though they had originally supported the cancellation, now they began backing away. Orr-Cahall, who had joined the Corcoran just a few months earlier, was left stranded. By December, having concluded that the cancellation was a mistake — "we should have damned the torpedoes," she said, "and gone full speed ahead" — she resigned.
A few months later, the Mapplethorpe bomb would go off again. The show traveled to the Contemporary Arts Center (CAC) in Cincinnati, Ohio. As soon as it arrived, police shut it down briefly so they could videotape the pictures. Those tapes would be used as evidence in the criminal trial of CAC director Dennis Barrie, who would find himself and his museum charged with obscenity in connection with seven Mapplethorpe photographs, five showing sadomasochistic sex and two inappropriate portraits of naked children. (Rosie and Jesse McBride - snap shots from the early 19760)

Taste Test

The cincinnatti exhibition quickly reopened and eventually played to 80,000 visitors, but by September 1990 Barrie was in court, facing up to a year in jail. The eight-member jury, four men and four women, were mostly blue-collar and suburban. Only three had ever been to a museum. Prosecutors were so confident that they would agree that Mapplethorpe's pictures were obscene that the only witnesses they called were police officers brought in to testify that the photographs had actually been in the show.

The strategy backfired. For five days the defense called a multitude of museum directors, critics and other experts to testify. (This led to some priceless moments, like when the Philadelphia curator who had organized the show explained how meticulously Mapplethorpe had positioned the wrist that was penetrating a man's anus.) But the larger argument — that however shocking some of them might be, the pictures could be considered as art — was sound and it worked. After just two hours of jury deliberation, Barrie and the museum were acquitted.

After that, "The Perfect Moment" was over, but the conservative war on the NEA was not. For years the NEA struggled to placate its critics. It established a review board to look into any complaints about work it funded. It required its beneficiaries to sign a pledge promising not to produce obscene art. But none of this appeased Republicans in Congress. After the GOP electoral sweep in 1994, they tried to abolish the agency altogether. When that failed, they cut its funding by more than a third. Artists angry about the NEA decency requirements took their grievances to federal courts, which more than once found the requirements unconstitutionally vague. In 1998 one of the cases reached the Supreme Court, only to result in a hair-splitting decision that satisfied no one.

Fights about government support for obscene art are rare these days and for an obvious reason: the government is a lot more careful about what it underwrites. After George W. Bush arrived at the White House, NEA funding started a slow climb back. President Barack Obama's first budget proposes to give the endowment $161.3 million. That figure, astonishingly, is still almost $8 million less than the agency got in 1989. Make no mistake, the battle over Mapplethorpe resulted in sustained harm to arts funding in the U.S. It was a perfect mess with a long, dismal aftermath.

Articles to read:

New York Times | http://www.nytimes.com/1989/07/22/arts/review-art-the-many-roles-of-mapplethorpe-acted-out-in-ever-shifting-images.html
Huffington Post | http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/23/robert-mapplethorpe_n_4473911.html
ART INFO | http://blogs.artinfo.com/artintheair/2016/01/26/robert-mapplethorpe-biopic-casts-its-lead-actor/
The Guardian | http://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/jan/23/robert-mapplethorpe-look-at-the-pictures-review-sundancehttp://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/jan/23/robert-mapplethorpe-look-at-the-pictures-review-sundance
Joe Pollitt | http://joepollitt.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/robert-mapplethorpe-child-protection.html





Robert Mapplethorpe | Self Portrait

No comments: